The MLM industry has, during the last 20 years, developed positive working relationships with regulatory agencies such as attorneys general and the FTC (Federal Trade Commission). There was a time, however, back in the 1970s, when the FTC challenged the legitimacy of the direct selling industry as being a pyramid scheme. They accused Amway of operating illegally and Amway prevailed in a very famous 1979 case [below] where it was held that the network marketing industry is a legitimate business model and the business opportunity is not a pyramid scheme.

No legal ruling has been more impactful on the direct sales industry than The Landmark Amway Case.

Afterwards, regulatory agencies and the industry went quiet until the 1990s when it was questioned whether or not product-using consultants were a legitimate end-destination for products or whether consultants were simply retail customers. There has been an ongoing tug of war between the MLM industry and the FTC in terms of determining whether or not personal use should have an impact on a company’s legitimate operations. The industry, with the cooperation of attorneys generals in more than a dozen states, were able to amend legislation in those states to recognize that personal use of product by distributors is a legitimate end-destination, just as if it were a retail sale.

More recently, about four years ago, the FTC decided to update its Business Opportunity Rule [below] (which is more oriented toward franchises or programs that require substantial investments). The proposed draft would have completely encompassed direct selling companies to the point that it would have been onerous to offer a MLM, network marketing, direct selling opportunity in the marketplace.

Read the article “FTC Exempts MLM/Direct Selling from FTC Revised Proposed Business Opportunity Rule.”

For instance, one of the proposed rules would have stated that if you approached your neighbor, for instance, about joining a network marketing company then you would have to wait a week before returning to follow up with them on their decision. This waiting period would not have been very conducive to offering a business opportunity, and therefore, not very practical for the network marketing industry. The industry responded to the proposed rule. Over 17,000 comments poured into the FTC from MLMLegal.com, the DSWA, the DSA, distributor associations, and direct selling companies indicating that they thought the rule was overreaching.

The net result gave rise to the FTC amending its proposed rule to carve out an exception for direct selling/MLM companies. Direct selling companies would not be included in the rule. This was a victory for the industry since it didn’t want onerous rules inhibiting the more than 15-16 million people in the U.S. industry from operating a legitimate MLM business.

At this time, we are in a fairly good regulatory environment. Every direct selling company at any one time, however, is being sent questions of inquiry from regulatory agencies such as the Federal Trade Commission and attorneys general. This is simply part of doing business in this industry. So, when you see that a company has been sent inquiries or investigative demands from regulatory agencies, it’s not always a good idea to jump to conclusions about the legitimacy of its operations. The regulatory agencies are just doing their job.

In the end there is always a balance of regulation that needs to be reached. Direct selling companies do it best when they take some initiative on their own to promote consumer protection by looking out for both their consumers and consultants. The reason the FTC ratcheted back on the business opportunity is because of the large influx of comments that flooded in from industry leaders, including MLMLegal.com and the DSWA. Industry-leading groups have the ability to mobilize large groups of people who are passionate about the network marketing industry and that helps our industry serve a great purpose.

MLMLegal.com keeps you updated on changes being made in the direct sales regulatory environment. Visit our network marketing news pages or MLMLegal.com for the latest information on the network marketing industry.

If you are interested in attending the Starting and Running the Successful MLM Companyconference visit our conference page, view our speaker list, or get more details. All executives/owners of direct selling companies are welcome to attend. Call 800-231-2162 to register.

Visit us at www.mlmlegal.com to learn more.

The FTC and the Direct Selling industry are clearly of the same opinion of the basic goal that the direct selling industry should prosper through effective and ethical practices. However, FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez emphasized new legal standards that would abandon a 40-year old gold standard, the Amway Safeguards Rule, and that would also upend and call into question decades of industry accepted business practices.

Briefly, the Chairwoman argued for:

1. Abandonment of reliance on the Amway Safeguards Rule as a key test for legitimacy.
2. Effectively creating a new legal standard patterned after those requested by the FTC in the FTC/Herbalife settlement that, in reality, may upend decades of industry accepted practices and rewrite 40 years of court legal standards.
3. The existing Court standard derives from:

(1)  Koscot … Compensation to upline should be based on sales to the ultimate user.

(2)  Amway … A program that enforces the Amway Safeguards of a retailing mandate to qualify for MLM commissions, a 70% rule that prohibits ordering unless product is sold or used and a reasonable buyback policy for inventory for terminating distributors, if effectively enforced and in conjunction with avoidance of inventory loading, is indicative of legitimacy. (Also, Amway did not challenge recognition of distributor personal use purchases as legitimate sales to the “ultimate user”.)

(3)  BurnLounge … The primary motivation for distributor purchases should be the purchase of product in reasonable amounts for resale or use as opposed to mere qualification in the program for rewards. A pyramid analysis will be “fact driven.”

1. On the FTC wish list for a new paradigm for legitimacy is:

(1)  Abandonment of the reliance on the Amway standard.

(2)  Redefining Koscot to require compensation to upline to be based on sales to the nonparticipant retail customer rather than the ultimate user.

(3)  Adopting the FTC/Herbalife settlement “punch list” of mandates in lieu of the factual analysis of “primary motivation,” called for in BurnLounge, including:

(a)    Only one-third of MLM compensation to upline should come from personal use by downline distributors, whether or not such purchases are reasonable in quantity for use by the distributor “ultimate user.”

(b)    Autoship to distributors should be prohibited.

(c)    Monthly activity volume requirements may not include any purchases by distributors.

(d)    Tracking of performance activity connected to wholesale purchasing should be banned.

Leading MLM industry expert Jeff Babener takes a closer look at what this means for the direct selling and multilevel marketing industry. Read the full article: Fact Checking the FTC’s New Legal Guidance

Visit us at www.mlmlegal.com to learn more.

In the context of direct selling, “opportunity,” in addition to the chance to make money, is a reference to the “business opportunity” of a direct selling/MLM marketing program.

The word “opportunity” is a generic term for the chance to advance, better one’s economic state, health, social position, etc. However, in the context of direct selling, “opportunity,” in addition to the chance to make money, is a reference to the “business opportunity” of a direct selling/MLM marketing program.

Two dozen states and the FTC regulate the offering of business opportunities in a parallel fashion to their regulation of franchise opportunities. Because of the low threshold of entry fees, typically, modestly-priced at-cost sales kits, the business opportunity of MLM companies is generally exempt from state business opportunity laws. In addition, the FTC has indicated that it generally does not view the offering of an MLM opportunity to trigger the FTC Business Opportunity Rule. Of course, multiple states have adopted specific MLM statutes to provide guidelines for the offering of a MLM opportunity. All of these statutes can be found in the statutes library at www.mlmlegal.com.

For more information on the network marketing industry visit www.mlmlegal.com and www.mlmattorney.com.

Find us on our social networks:

Google+

LinkedIn

Twitter

Facebook

Our next Starting and Running the Successful MLM Company Conference takes place October 27 and 28, 2016 in Las Vegas. Call 503-226-6600 or 800-231-2162 to register. If you’d like to see how you can get free tickets to the next MLM Startup Conference, visit our Innovation Campaign page.

Visit us at www.mlmlegal.com to learn more.

As industry experts, MLM attorneys commonly know more about multilevel marketing and direct selling than most of their clients.

An experienced and seasoned direct sales attorney can be the single most valuable resource that a MLM company can ever utilize. Look for a professional who has represented leading direct selling companies as well as startup companies.

As industry experts, they commonly know more about multilevel marketing and direct selling than most of their clients. In fact, more than half of the conversations with clients involve discussions about the MLM industry, rather than mere legal aspects of running a direct sales company. And over time, such an experienced “consigliore” may become the most trusted business advisor to a company and a vital member of the business team.

Apart from tremendous insight into the “business,” an experienced network marketing attorney can answer in five minutes what would take a business attorney five hours to research. And, the business attorney would likely still not completely understand the issue, let alone the solution.

The direct sales industry has – for better or for worse – provoked vast amounts of legislation and regulatory control that multilevel marketing attorneys must navigate.

A brief list of regulations, legislation, and legalities that experienced MLM attorneys, such as Jeff Babener, of Babener & Associates, must commonly appraise include:

– Pyramid statutes

– MLM statutes

– Business Opportunity Rule

– Securities

– FTC regulations

– Postal regulations

– FDA rules and regulations

– Distributor relationships

– Vendor relationships

– Distributor discipline

– Trademark

– IRS and tax regulations

– International expansion

– Sales tax

– Marketing

– State law and registration

– And, legal review of sales kit contents, which include:

1) Consultant agreements

2) Policies and Procedures

3) Product brochures

4) Compensation plan

5) Marketing plan presentations

6) Forms, from receipts to multiple owner applications, etc

At the very least, a direct sales company should not enter the marketplace without legal review of its marketing program. Hiccups caused by having to respond to regulatory agencies, consultant complaints, vendor conflicts, etc. can be bad for any MLM business and its reputation.

For more information, watch the video The Legal Issues of Starting and Running a MLM Company.

Visit www.mlmlegal.com and www.mlmattorney.com for more information on recruiting MLM consultants.

Find us on our social networks:

Google+

LinkedIn

Twitter

Myspace

Facebook

Our next Starting and Running the Successful MLM Company Conference takes place October 24th & 25th, 2013 in Las Vegas. Call 503-226-6600 or 800-231-2162 to register.

Visit us at www.mlmlegal.com to learn more.